Texas Capital Report · Legislative Intelligence · National Data System

Who Represents Texas' Active Military Communities?

A factual Texas House and Senate bill-development matrix connecting current legislators to active or operational military installations through governed district–ZIP geography.
This is not a ranking. The matrix is designed to help identify the House and Senate members with a geographic reason to participate in legislation supporting active military installations and surrounding military communities.
181House + Senate districts
150Texas House members
31Texas Senate members
41Active installations in the ≤50-mile delegation view

How to use this for bill development

  • By Legislator identifies each current House and Senate member's closest active-installation connection and district-wide military context.
  • By Active Installation groups the legislators whose district ZIP relationships connect to the same installation within 50 miles. That view is intended to help identify potential authors, joint authors, coauthors and cross-chamber sponsors.
  • Geographic connection does not itself determine who should lead a bill. Committee jurisdiction, legislative history, local installation priorities and member interest should be layered on top.
  • House 89R committee portfolios appear when the governed House committee-history source is locally available. Senate committee portfolios are not asserted by this build.
  • Current House/Senate names come from the governed repaired 181-member roster; the Accountability roster is used only as secondary enrichment where available.

Methodology

  • "Active/operational" follows the governed military source classification; it does not mean active-duty population.
  • Distance is measured from governed ZIP coordinates to installation footprints.
  • District-wide measures use normalized ZIP boundary-overlap weights. They are not population-weighted constituent estimates.
  • The active ≤10-mile overlap percentage is geographic context, not a share of residents.
  • Non-spatial postal ZIPs remain unassessed rather than receiving false zero values.
  • No ranking, score, percentile or best/worst designation is created.